The Communication Adaptiveness and Power Dynamics of the State, the Market, and Civil Society in the
2014.01.09 Views 1837
- 제목: The Communication
Adaptiveness and Power Dynamics of the State, the Market, and Civil Society in
the Information Age: the Case of Korea
- 저자: Jongkil Kim,
Jongtae Kim (교신저자; HK연구교수),
Andrew Ho Kim
- 출판정보: Published Online
Before Print (December 2013), Information, Communication & Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.869241
- 논문초록
The authority of the state and the
market, the duumvirate of the industrial society, has been challenged in
various ways in the current information era advanced by the rapid development
of information and communication technology. By comparison, the weight of civil
organizations has increased sharply, and netizens equipped with information
technology have emerged as a major player in civil society. This article experientially
examines the changes in power dynamics of the state, the market, and civil
society in the Korean context, based on a survey of people’s perception of the communication adaptiveness of these spheres,
that is, their openness and exclusiveness internally and externally. The survey
results suggest that the state sphere tends to be perceived as less
communicative and open than the market and civil society. By contrast, civil
society is perceived to be the most open and communicative sphere. This may reflect
some change in power dynamics of these spheres, which can be characterized as
the rise of civil society and the relative decline of the state. In terms of
the power dynamics of the three spheres, the results challenge the conventional
trichotomous model assuming somewhat clear boundaries between the state, the
market, and civil society. Given that the findings of this article derive from
the Korean situation and, thus, are valid mainly in the Korean context, this
article shows an important socio-political change in the information age: that
is, mutually interactive and overlapping processes among the spheres can
accelerate by the rise of ‘digital citizens’ and civil society’s increasing power.