- 제목: 1927년 재만동포옹호동맹의 결성과 화교배척사건
- 저자: 박정현
- 출판정보: 중국학보 65집(2014.6)
- 논문초록:

Relationship between Activity of Protection Alliance for Korean residents in Manchuria and the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927

This research is about relationship between activty of Protection Alliance for Korea-Chinese in Manchuria and the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927. The overseas-Chinese exclusion in Chosun in 1927 has various elements: contempt and hostility of Korean toward Chinese, reaction against persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria, expression of repressed national sentiment in different form, method of expand of mass movement by strengthening local activity by Singanhoe(新幹會), and confliction of rights and interests of Manchuria between China and Japan.

The persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria and the overseas-Chinese exclusion in Chosun have different aspects and major problems. However, it becomes the standard to decide treatment and policy for immigrants in Chosun and China. If any problems happen, such as discrimination of Korean Residents in Manchuria, Koreans reacted similar to Chinese in Chosun because there is no way to solve this problem directly. For the procedure to expand rights in Manchuria, Japanese Government-General of Korea and Japan related Chinese policy of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria because it needed to be settled down. Therefore, problem of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria and the overseas-Chinese exclusion problem in Chosun were recognized as interrelated problem, and the treatment and reaction method are also interrelated.

Immigrants are separated from protection of home government, and community system of migrant area is relatively separated. They are relatively free from community system’s control; on the other hand, they are separated from protection from community system. Thus, it has enough reasons, which may transferred into vicarious gratification target for complaints and anger.

The overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927 is about gathering organization for nationalist movement by using discrimination of Korean residents in Manchuria under the consequences that nationalists group of Chosun cannot complain against Japan. They began nationalist movement by attacking Chinese, who had less social and political power, and adequately expressed the citizen’s complaints. Japan, who responded passively against the overseas-Chinese exclusion, gave China pressure by using idea of persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria as containment of Manchuria invasion. Also, Japan succeeded to turn the Korean’s complaints to China. Although China assumed that Korea-Chinese in Manchuria are the agent of Japan for Manchuria invasion, which causes persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria as method of giving pressure to Japan, this policy had to be alleviated because the overseas-Chinese in Chosun also gets injured at the same time. The immigrant persecution, begun by confliction between China and Japan for Manchuria, made Chosun nationalists, Japan, and Beijing warlord government to successfully achieve strategic goal. However, each immigrants, who did not received any protection from the community, were sacrificed. Although each of them couldn’t fight against the enemy directly, the immigrants, who were the substitute without any power, were seriously injured. After modernization, East-Asia immigrants were sometimes sacrificed when opposite nation needed social and political target

The overseas-Chinese exclusion, brought by revenge of persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria, alleviated the persecution, consequentially. This Activity is the overseas-Chinese exclusion as massive as Wanbao Mountain Incident(萬寶山事件) in 1931. The persecution of Korea-Chinese in Manchuria, the cause of the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927, continued without any solution, and it initiated the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1931. The exclusion in 1931 had similar procedure and resolution. The experiences of the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927 made the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1931 more aggressive. Therefore, the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1927 and 1931 should be handled carefully with interrelationship. In this sense, the truth of the overseas-Chinese exclusion and relationship with protection movement for Korea-Chinese in Manchuria will be a motivation to understand the overseas-Chinese exclusion in 1931 in different point of view.